ftdnastat Русский

United Kingdom: haplogroups

FamilyTreeDNA has 9,757 kits with a Y-DNA result and 4,471 kits with mtDNA (mitochondrial DNA). On the paternal line the most common are R1b-L51 — 57%, I1 — 15% and I2 — 8%. On the maternal line the most common are H — 45%, U — 14% and J1 — 8%. YFull has 235 samples for Y from the same area, and its mix of major branches is noticeably different. The largest gap is R1b-M269: 60% on FTDNA against 40% on YFull.

Compare with…
28.9
Y-DNA · kits per 100,000 men
rank 34 of 123 among countries. About 34 million men (UN, 2023). A kit's country is the ancestor's homeland, not where the tester lives
6.5
mtDNA · kits per 100,000 people
rank 33 of 93 among countries. About 69 million people (UN, 2023)

Mitotree, the mt tree of FTDNA Discover, has about 1,895 more samples from here that the public mt tree lacks: mostly academic studies, GenBank among them (copy of 11 November 2026). This page is built from the public FTDNA tree.

Paternal line · Y-DNA

9,757 kits · 30 branches
Main branches of the Y tree. Each branch counts every kit in it and in its sub-branches; sub-branches are indented. Age is how many years ago the branch's common ancestor lived (TMRCA).
6,434 · 65.9% 28k years
5,900 · 60.5% 6,500 years
5,542 · 56.8% 6,100 years
3,164 · 32.4% 4,900 years
1,866 · 19.1% 4,700 years
1,548 · 15.9% 4,600 years
728 · 7.5% 4,500 years
607 · 6.2% 4,700 years
312 · 3.2% 4,600 years
451 · 4.6% 4,700 years
312 · 3.2% 4,600 years
1,716 · 17.6% 5,000 years
788 · 8.1% 4,500 years
506 · 5.2% 4,200 years
237 · 2.4% 4,600 years
385 · 3.9% 8,500 years
2,318 · 23.8% 35k years
1,450 · 14.9% 20k years
898 · 9.2% 4,500 years
449 · 4.6% 4,500 years
322 · 3.3% 4,300 years
260 · 2.7% 3,900 years
797 · 8.2% 25k years
489 · 5.0% 17k years
349 · 3.6% 13k years
294 · 3.0% 52k years
246 · 2.5% 25k years
285 · 2.9% 30k years
278 · 2.8% 28k years
219 · 2.2% 19k years
other
148 · 1.5%

Among the rest: T 59, Q 47, H 17, F 8, N 6, L 5, A 2, O 2, B 1, C 1.

Maternal line · mtDNA

4,471 kits · 30 branches
Main mt-tree branches grouped by letter, sub-branches indented. Each branch counts every kit in it and in its sub-branches. Age is how many years ago the branch's common foremother lived, from FTDNA data where available.
2,001 · 44.8% 11k years
730 · 16.3% 7,900 years
153 · 3.4%
126 · 2.8% 5,300 years
251 · 5.6% 6,700 years
167 · 3.7% 8,400 years
113 · 2.5% 7,700 years
121 · 2.7% 8,000 years
98 · 2.2% 7,900 years
615 · 13.8% 51k years
U5a'b
390 · 8.7% 30k years
196 · 4.4% 25k years
121 · 2.7% 19k years
194 · 4.3% 21k years
141 · 3.2% 13k years
U2'3'4'7'8'9
211 · 4.7% 50k years
120 · 2.7% 22k years
452 · 10.1% 35k years
367 · 8.2% 28k years
312 · 7.0% 13k years
436 · 9.8% 20k years
335 · 7.5% 15k years
214 · 4.8% 8,500 years
101 · 2.3% 13k years
384 · 8.6% 29k years
314 · 7.0% 23k years
217 · 4.9% 11k years
98 · 2.2% 11k years
141 · 3.2% 17k years
141 · 3.2% 7,500 years
other
301 · 6.7%

Among the rest: HV 80, W 78, X 67, L 22, M 12, A 11, R 11, N 10, B 5, D 2, C 1, E 1, G 1.

Migration paths of the characteristic branches #

Paths of the region's main characteristic branches, as modelled by FamilyTreeDNA Discover, on one calendar clock: in each year a branch stands where its ancestral line was. Grey is a stretch of path shared by several branches; the large marker is the branch itself.

Show the mapHide the map The map unfolds by itself as you scroll down to it.

Loading the map…

  • H66a · 0%
  • Shared trunk
  • Territory: United Kingdom
  • Dotted: ftdnastat's estimate

The time scale is logarithmic: the closer to the present, the longer a year takes.

United Kingdom: Y-DNA #

Most similar countries

Countries whose mix of major branches looks most like this one. The number is similarity: 100% is the same mix, lower means less in common. Computed only for countries with 100+ kits.

2–15%16–22%23–40%41–62%63–98%United Kingdomunder 100 kits
All 112 countries and regions by similarity
  1. England 98%
  2. United States 92%
  3. Scotland 90%
  4. Wales 89%
  5. Canada 88%
  6. France 87%
  7. Netherlands 87%
  8. Germany 86%
  9. Denmark 82%
  10. Belgium 82%
  11. Ireland 81%
  12. Northern Ireland 80%
  13. Switzerland 78%
  14. Australia 76%
  15. England (Cornish) 70%
  16. Portugal 67%
  17. Spain 67%
  18. Norway 66%
  19. United States (Native American) 65%
  20. Italy 64%
  21. Austria 64%
  22. Sweden 62%
  23. Brazil 62%
  24. Luxembourg 60%
  25. New Zealand 59%
  26. Czech Republic 59%
  27. Hungary 59%
  28. Puerto Rico 57%
  29. South Africa 55%
  30. Poland 54%
  31. Mexico 52%
  32. Cuba 52%
  33. Slovakia 49%
  34. Colombia 48%
  35. Romania 48%
  36. Slovenia 46%
  37. Jamaica 46%
  38. Greece 45%
  39. Ukraine 43%
  40. Iceland 43%
  41. Russia 42%
  42. Chile 42%
  43. Argentina 41%
  44. Isle of Man 41%
  45. Bulgaria 40%
  46. Dominican Republic 38%
  47. Belarus 38%
  48. Lithuania 38%
  49. Italy (Sicily) 37%
  50. Croatia 36%
  51. Latvia 36%
  52. Serbia 35%
  53. Macedonia 32%
  54. Turkey 31%
  55. Israel 30%
  56. Peru 30%
  57. Albania 29%
  58. Moldova 29%
  59. Estonia 29%
  60. Lebanon 28%
  61. Armenia 26%
  62. Finland 26%
  63. Iran 25%
  64. Bosnia and Herzegovina 25%
  65. Syria 23%
  66. Egypt 23%
  67. Tatarstan 23%
  68. Georgia 22%
  69. Iraq 22%
  70. Azerbaijan 22%
  71. Morocco 21%
  72. Uzbekistan 21%
  73. Montenegro 20%
  74. Algeria 20%
  75. Palestine 19%
  76. India 19%
  77. Bahrain 18%
  78. Tunisia 18%
  79. Afghanistan 18%
  80. Kazakhstan 18%
  81. Kuwait 17%
  82. Mordovia 17%
  83. Bashkortostan 17%
  84. Jordan 17%
  85. Saudi Arabia 17%
  86. Qatar 16%
  87. United Arab Emirates 16%
  88. Libya 16%
  89. Tajikistan 16%
  90. Dagestan 15%
  91. Chuvashia 15%
  92. Adygea 14%
  93. Pakistan 13%
  94. Sudan 13%
  95. Oman 12%
  96. Yemen 12%
  97. Sri Lanka 12%
  98. Philippines 10%
  99. Chechnya 9%
  100. Indonesia 8%
  101. Cameroon 8%
  102. Nigeria 7%
  103. China 7%
  104. Mongolia 6%
  105. Somalia 5%
  106. Orstkhoy (Aosta Valley in FTDNA) 5%
  107. Ingushetia 4%
  108. Ghana 4%
  109. Vietnam 3%
  110. Karelia 3%
  111. South Korea 3%
  112. Japan 2%

United Kingdom: mtDNA #

Distinctive branches

Branches found here far more often than worldwide: their share is more than 3× the world share. The multiplier is in brackets. Branches of at least 10 kits are included.

  • H66a: 11 kits · 0.2% (95% confidence interval: 0–0%) (×3.3)

Most similar countries

Countries whose mix of major branches looks most like this one. The number is similarity: 100% is the same mix, lower means less in common. Computed only for countries with 100+ kits.

0–28%29–50%51–72%73–85%86–97%United Kingdomunder 100 kits
All 71 countries and regions by similarity
  1. England 97%
  2. Ireland 95%
  3. Scotland 95%
  4. United States 94%
  5. Germany 93%
  6. Sweden 91%
  7. France 90%
  8. Norway 90%
  9. Netherlands 90%
  10. Wales 88%
  11. Northern Ireland 87%
  12. Denmark 87%
  13. Switzerland 87%
  14. Canada 86%
  15. Czech Republic 85%
  16. Belgium 84%
  17. Poland 84%
  18. Austria 83%
  19. Hungary 82%
  20. Russia 82%
  21. Slovakia 79%
  22. Italy 79%
  23. Australia 77%
  24. Ukraine 76%
  25. Portugal 76%
  26. Estonia 75%
  27. Finland 75%
  28. Slovenia 74%
  29. Croatia 72%
  30. Spain 71%
  31. Lithuania 71%
  32. Bulgaria 70%
  33. Romania 70%
  34. Serbia 70%
  35. United States (Native American) 69%
  36. Latvia 66%
  37. Belarus 66%
  38. Greece 66%
  39. Bosnia and Herzegovina 64%
  40. Moldova 57%
  41. Algeria 54%
  42. Turkey 54%
  43. Morocco 50%
  44. Chechnya 50%
  45. New Zealand 49%
  46. Syria 47%
  47. Armenia 46%
  48. Israel 46%
  49. Lebanon 43%
  50. South Africa 40%
  51. Cuba 37%
  52. Brazil 37%
  53. Egypt 37%
  54. Iraq 36%
  55. Iran 35%
  56. Saudi Arabia 33%
  57. United Arab Emirates 28%
  58. Kuwait 27%
  59. Argentina 24%
  60. Mexico 22%
  61. Dominican Republic 22%
  62. India 19%
  63. Puerto Rico 18%
  64. Canada (First Nations) 15%
  65. Jamaica 9%
  66. Chile 8%
  67. China 8%
  68. Colombia 5%
  69. Japan 3%
  70. Philippines 0%
  71. South Korea 0%
YFull

The same country on YFull #

The same country at the second company, YFull. Its samples are placed on the FTDNA tree by shared mutations, so the branches are comparable. FTDNA share on the left, YFull on the right, then the difference in percentage points. Republics and other sub-regions are taken out of the country, as at FTDNA. Starred branches are nearly empty at YFull: every test there is whole-genome and reaches the fine branches. Only YFull customers (YF number) are counted, no ancient DNA. YFull data of 2026-11-02. The tree shows only its top three levels.

Y-DNA

9,757
FTDNA
kits
235
YFull
samples
FTDNAYFull
FTDNA · YFull · Δ
R R-M207
65.9% · 46.8%−19.1
R1b-M269 R-M269
60.5% · 39.6%−20.9
L51 R-L51
56.8% · 39.6%−17.2
R1a-M198 R-M198
3.9% · 5.5%+1.6
I I-L758
23.8% · 41.3%+17.5
I1 I-M253
14.9% · 26.8%+11.9
DF29 I-DF29
9.2% · 26.8%+17.6
I2 I-P215
8.2% · 14.5%+6.3
I2b I-M223
5.0% · 6.8%+1.8
E E-M96
3.0% · 5.1%+2.1
E1b1b-M35 E-M35
2.5% · 3.0%+0.5
J J-M304
2.9% · 1.3%−1.6
G G-M201
2.8% · 3.8%+1
G2a G-P15
2.2% · 3.4%+1.2

mtDNA

4,471
FTDNA
kits
48
YFull
samples
FTDNAYFull
FTDNA · YFull · Δ
44.8% · 43.8%−1
16.3% · 10.4%−5.9
3.4% · 0.0%−3.4
2.8% · 0.0%−2.8
5.6% · 12.5%+6.9
3.7% · 4.2%+0.4
2.5% · 2.1%−0.4
2.7% · 2.1%−0.6
2.2% · 2.1%−0.1
13.8% · 8.3%−5.4
U5a'b
8.7% · 2.1%−6.6
4.4% · 2.1%−2.3
4.3% · 0.0%−4.3
U2'3'4'7'8'9
4.7% · 6.3%+1.5
2.7% · 0.0%−2.7
10.1% · 10.4%+0.3
8.2% · 8.3%+0.1
7.0% · 6.3%−0.7
9.8% · 2.1%−7.7
7.5% · 2.1%−5.4
4.8% · 2.1%−2.7
2.3% · 0.0%−2.3
8.6% · 4.2%−4.4
7.0% · 4.2%−2.9
4.9% · 4.2%−0.7
3.2% · 8.3%+5.2
3.2% · 8.3%+5.2

The same country on the project maps

In the FTDNA geographic projects a member puts the place of their paternal or maternal ancestor on the map. Here those points are set against the public tree: solid bar the tree, hatched bar the points on the maps, copy of 2026-10-20. A person in several projects counts once. Branches as in the tree above: each counts every kit in it and in its sub-branches.

Y-DNA FTDNA 9,757 · Projects 2,673

FTDNAProjects
FTDNA · Projects · Δ
R R-M207
65.9% · 74.3%+8.4
R1b-M269 R-M269
60.5% · 69.9%+9.5
L51 R-L51
56.8% · 53.6%−3.2
P312 R-P312
32.4% · 40.1%+7.6
L21 R-L21
19.1% · 30.1%+11
DF13 R-DF13
15.9% · 27.9%+12
Z39589 R-Z39589
7.5% · 15.5%+8.1
DF27 R-DF27
6.2% · 4.7%−1.5
U106 R-U106
17.6% · 10.1%−7.5
L48 R-L48
8.1% · 4.6%−3.5
I I-L758
23.8% · 18.3%−5.5
I1 I-M253
14.9% · 9.5%−5.3
DF29 I-DF29
9.2% · 6.6%−2.6
I2 I-P215
8.2% · 7.3%−0.8

mtDNA FTDNA 4,471 · Projects 1,014

FTDNAProjects
FTDNA · Projects · Δ
44.8% · 46.2%+1.4
16.3% · 15.0%−1.3
5.6% · 3.4%−2.3
13.8% · 12.0%−1.7
U5a'b
8.7% · 5.5%−3.2
10.1% · 10.4%+0.2
8.2% · 8.3%+0.1
7.0% · 6.7%−0.3
9.8% · 9.6%−0.2
7.5% · 7.4%−0.1
4.8% · 3.5%−1.3
8.6% · 8.3%−0.3
7.0% · 5.5%−1.5
4.9% · 2.8%−2.1
2,746
Y-DNA · People on the map
2,673 of them have a branch of the tree; relatives with one ancestor at one place count as one, 2,715 such votes
79%
Y-DNA · SNP-confirmed
that many have the branch confirmed by an SNP test, the rest predicted from STRs
1,014
mtDNA · People on the map
1,014 of them have a branch of the tree; relatives with one ancestor at one place count as one, 1,010 such votes
72%
agreement with YFull · Y
how closely the Y tree branches match between FTDNA and YFull, each branch counted without its sub-branches. 100% is identical, below 80% is visibly different.
R-M269 −20.9
gap to YFull · Y
the Y branch whose share differs most between the two companies: FTDNA 60.5%, YFull 39.6%
21% / 20%
reached the finest branch: YFull / FTDNA
share of YFull samples and FTDNA kits that reached the finest branch of the FTDNA tree. On average a YFull sample sits 38.5 branchings from the root, an FTDNA kit 34.4
20%
Y-DNA · on leaves
share of kits that reached the finest branch of the tree. The rest stopped at a broad branch: their test was not detailed enough.
35%
Big Y
rough share of kits with a Big Y test, a full read of the Y chromosome. It is estimated from the branches where the region's kits sit, so it is an estimate, not a count.
42%
mtDNA · on leaves
share of kits that reached the finest branch of the tree. The rest stopped at a broad branch: their test was not detailed enough.
0.46
mt to Y
mtDNA kits per one Y-DNA kit. Below 0.3 means the country tests almost only the paternal line.

New this month #

FTDNA: how much the kit count grew between the tree copies of 2026-10-09 and 2026-11-12. A kit that moved to a new sub-branch after refinement is not counted as new. YFull: samples YFull itself marks as new, in the copy of 2026-11-02; YFull drops the mark after a few weeks.

+32
Y-DNA, FTDNA
new kits, 2026-10-09 → 2026-11-12
+15
mtDNA, FTDNA
new kits, 2026-10-12 → 2026-11-11
+1
Y-DNA, YFull
new samples as of 2026-11-02

Y-DNA: branches that grew

mtDNA: branches that grew

New Y-DNA samples in YFull

YFull

Peoples and languages on YFull #

Native language reported by YFull customers from this country. People from regions with a page of their own (republics, autonomies) are shown there. These are the testers' own answers, not a census.

YFull

Recent kin across borders #

Shared young paternal branches: YFull customers from this country and from the partner country have a common paternal-line ancestor no older than 500 years. The comparison accounts for how linked a country is abroad overall: shown are partners with more shared branches than its general openness would give. It reflects recent migration and shared ancestry, not ethnicity.

Recent kin across borders
Country shared branches expected × chance?
United States 70 17.5 4.0 unlikely by chance p < 0.001
Ireland 24 5.9 4.1 unlikely by chance p < 0.001

Ancient relatives of male lines #

Which cultures of the Copper Age and Early Bronze Age (4000–2000 BCE) the local male lines lead to most closely. The share is how many kits lead to a culture; the range is in brackets.

United Kingdom Bell Beaker culture and Neolithic Scandinavian: 83.4% Bell Beaker culture and Neolithic Scandinavian ≈ 2,200–2,300 BCE 83% 17%
United Kingdom Bell Beaker culture and Neolithic Scandinavian Bell Beaker culture and Neolithic Scandinavian · R1b: 60.6% R1b Bell Beaker culture and Neolithic Scandinavian: R1b → R1b 48.2% Bell Beaker culture and Neolithic Scandinavian: R1b → R1b 12.4% Bell Beaker culture and Neolithic Scandinavian · I1: 12.5% I1 Bell Beaker culture and Neolithic Scandinavian: I1 → I1 12.1% Bell Beaker culture and Neolithic Scandinavian: I1 → I 0.4% Bell Beaker culture and Neolithic Scandinavian · I2b: 3.5% Bell Beaker culture and Neolithic Scandinavian: I2b → I2b 2.3% Bell Beaker culture and Neolithic Scandinavian: I2b → I2b 1.2% Bell Beaker culture and Neolithic Scandinavian · R1a: 4.0% R1a Bell Beaker culture and Neolithic Scandinavian: R1a → R1a 3.7% Bell Beaker culture and Neolithic Scandinavian: R1a → R1a 0.4% Bell Beaker culture and Neolithic Scandinavian · G2a: 0.8% Bell Beaker culture and Neolithic Scandinavian: G2a → G2a 0.8% Bell Beaker culture and Neolithic Scandinavian · I2a: 0.4% Bell Beaker culture and Neolithic Scandinavian: I2a → I2a 0.4% Bell Beaker culture and Neolithic Scandinavian · I2: 0.8% Bell Beaker culture and Neolithic Scandinavian: I2 → I2 0.8% R1b 62% I1 15% I2b 5% R1a 4% G2a 2% I2 1% … 6%
Left: the major branches through which the lines lead to a culture; right: all major branches. Grey: the part of a branch without ancient relatives of this era.
How it is counted
  • Branches of the era. We take the ancient samples whose date falls inside the era, and compare the lines as they stood 1,500 years before the era ends.
  • A culture’s profile is the share of its lines on those branches. The number of samples does not change a weight: a culture of seven men weighs as much as one of a hundred and twenty.
  • A shallow test. An ancient man typed above the cut is spread over the branches under his node, by how many men each holds now. Today’s kits are treated the same way.
  • Who is admitted. A culture takes part when its sharply typed men cover 25% of the population on their own: branch by branch we add the smaller of the two shares, the culture’s and the population’s. One dug within 550 km needs only 0.5%.
  • The shares. We pick the weights of the cultures so that their mixture comes as close as it can to today’s set of branches.
  • Look-alike cultures. When cultures share almost all their branches, the data cannot say whose kin the men are. So we do not split the share between them: they get one bar.
  • The range. We recount everything on random subsets of the samples. In brackets are the bounds the share keeps in nine runs out of ten. A share that can fall below 5%, or below half of itself, is not shown at all.

What it does not mean. This is kinship of male lines, not the origin of a people. The female lines say nothing here. Who takes a test is a matter of chance, so the shares compare between countries, not with a census.

Ancient samples

From excavations on this territory: 10 samples by Y-DNA and 145 samples by mtDNA. The oldest: 4,146 BCE, K1b1a1.

Viking Age British 4 · Medieval British 3 · Iron Age British 2 · Early Modern British 1

All ancient samples →

Data on this page: FamilyTreeDNA Y tree, 12 November 2026: 9,757 kits; FamilyTreeDNA mtDNA tree, 11 November 2026: 4,471 kits; YFull Y tree, 2 November 2026: 235 samples; YFull mtDNA tree, 2 November 2026: 48 samples.

How to cite: ftdnastat, "United Kingdom: Y-DNA and mtDNA haplogroups", https://ftdnastat.github.io/en/c/united-kingdom/, data of 2026-11-14, build 20261114-18dba71.

The data is licensed under CC BY 4.0: take it, rework it, just credit ftdnastat.