ftdnastat Русский

England: haplogroups

FamilyTreeDNA has 27,817 kits with a Y-DNA result and 12,386 kits with mtDNA (mitochondrial DNA). On the paternal line the most common are R1b-L51 — 56%, I1 — 15% and I2 — 8%. On the maternal line the most common are H — 44%, U — 13% and T2 — 8%. YFull has 1,939 samples for Y from the same area, and its mix of major branches is broadly the same. The largest gap is I1-DF29: 9% on FTDNA against 19% on YFull.

Compare with…
99.7
Y-DNA · kits per 100,000 men
rank 10 of 123 among countries. About 28 million men (Wikidata, 2022). A kit's country is the ancestor's homeland, not where the tester lives
21.8
mtDNA · kits per 100,000 people
rank 9 of 93 among countries. About 57 million people (Wikidata, 2022)

Paternal line · Y-DNA

27,817 kits · 30 branches
Main branches of the Y tree. Each branch counts every kit in it and in its sub-branches; sub-branches are indented. Age is how many years ago the branch's common ancestor lived (TMRCA).
18,026 · 64.8% 28k years
15,705 · 56.5% 6,100 years
8,187 · 29.4% 4,900 years
4,152 · 14.9% 4,700 years
3,412 · 12.3% 4,600 years
1,537 · 5.5% 4,500 years
1,968 · 7.1% 4,700 years
1,175 · 4.2% 4,600 years
1,516 · 5.4% 4,700 years
1,039 · 3.7% 4,600 years
5,598 · 20.1% 5,000 years
2,543 · 9.1% 4,500 years
1,695 · 6.1% 4,200 years
803 · 2.9% 4,600 years
673 · 2.4% 4,400 years
1,110 · 4.0% 8,500 years
6,800 · 24.4% 35k years
4,282 · 15.4% 20k years
2,599 · 9.3% 4,500 years
1,324 · 4.8% 4,500 years
1,001 · 3.6% 4,300 years
667 · 2.4% 3,900 years
2,325 · 8.4% 25k years
1,362 · 4.9% 17k years
968 · 3.5% 13k years
945 · 3.4% 52k years
819 · 2.9% 25k years
845 · 3.0% 30k years
682 · 2.5% 28k years
798 · 2.9% 28k years
other
403 · 1.4%

Among the rest: Q 134, T 112, N 40, H 37, F 26, L 16, A 15, C 14, O 8, K 1.

Maternal line · mtDNA

12,386 kits · 30 branches
Main mt-tree branches grouped by letter, sub-branches indented. Each branch counts every kit in it and in its sub-branches. Age is how many years ago the branch's common foremother lived, from FTDNA data where available.
5,492 · 44.3% 11k years
2,048 · 16.5% 7,900 years
378 · 3.1%
366 · 3.0% 5,300 years
304 · 2.5% 4,800 years
651 · 5.3% 6,700 years
473 · 3.8% 8,400 years
311 · 2.5% 7,700 years
308 · 2.5% 11k years
286 · 2.3% 7,900 years
304 · 2.5% 8,000 years
1,618 · 13.1% 51k years
U5a'b
1,056 · 8.5% 30k years
573 · 4.6% 21k years
437 · 3.5% 13k years
483 · 3.9% 25k years
286 · 2.3% 19k years
U2'3'4'7'8'9
516 · 4.2% 50k years
1,315 · 10.6% 20k years
1,043 · 8.4% 15k years
667 · 5.4% 8,500 years
271 · 2.2% 13k years
1,260 · 10.2% 35k years
1,011 · 8.2% 28k years
877 · 7.1% 13k years
1,093 · 8.8% 29k years
869 · 7.0% 23k years
609 · 4.9% 11k years
415 · 3.4% 7,500 years
358 · 2.9% 17k years
other
835 · 6.7%

Among the rest: HV 239, W 227, X 191, N 48, L 36, R 27, A 23, M 22, B 10, C 7, D 3, G 1, S 1.

Migration paths of the characteristic branches #

Paths of the region's main characteristic branches, as modelled by FamilyTreeDNA Discover, on one calendar clock: in each year a branch stands where its ancestral line was. Grey is a stretch of path shared by several branches; the large marker is the branch itself.

Show the mapHide the map The map unfolds by itself as you scroll down to it.

Loading the map…

  • R-S1690 · 2%
  • Shared trunk
  • Territory: England

The time scale is logarithmic: the closer to the present, the longer a year takes.

England: Y-DNA #

Distinctive branches

Branches found here far more often than worldwide: their share is more than 3× the world share. The multiplier is in brackets. Branches of at least 10 kits are included.

  • R-U198: 616 kits · 2.2% (95% confidence interval: 2–2%) (×3.1) 3,800 years
  • R-S1690: 551 kits · 2.0% (95% confidence interval: 2–2%) (×3.1) 3,600 years

Most similar countries

Countries whose mix of major branches looks most like this one. The number is similarity: 100% is the same mix, lower means less in common. Computed only for countries with 100+ kits.

3–15%16–22%23–38%39–62%63–98%Englandunder 100 kits
All 111 countries and regions by similarity
  1. United Kingdom 98%
  2. United States 92%
  3. Netherlands 89%
  4. France 89%
  5. Germany 88%
  6. Wales 88%
  7. Canada 87%
  8. Scotland 87%
  9. Denmark 84%
  10. Belgium 83%
  11. Switzerland 79%
  12. Ireland 77%
  13. Northern Ireland 76%
  14. Australia 75%
  15. Portugal 68%
  16. Spain 68%
  17. Norway 67%
  18. Italy 65%
  19. United States (Native American) 65%
  20. Austria 65%
  21. Sweden 64%
  22. Brazil 63%
  23. Luxembourg 62%
  24. Czech Republic 60%
  25. Hungary 59%
  26. Puerto Rico 58%
  27. New Zealand 57%
  28. South Africa 55%
  29. Poland 54%
  30. Cuba 53%
  31. Mexico 53%
  32. Slovakia 49%
  33. Colombia 49%
  34. Slovenia 48%
  35. Romania 47%
  36. Greece 46%
  37. Jamaica 45%
  38. Ukraine 43%
  39. Argentina 43%
  40. Chile 43%
  41. Russia 43%
  42. Iceland 41%
  43. Bulgaria 40%
  44. Dominican Republic 39%
  45. Isle of Man 38%
  46. Italy (Sicily) 38%
  47. Lithuania 37%
  48. Croatia 37%
  49. Belarus 37%
  50. Serbia 36%
  51. Latvia 36%
  52. Macedonia 32%
  53. Turkey 31%
  54. Peru 31%
  55. Estonia 30%
  56. Israel 29%
  57. Albania 29%
  58. Moldova 29%
  59. Lebanon 28%
  60. Finland 26%
  61. Armenia 26%
  62. Bosnia and Herzegovina 25%
  63. Iran 25%
  64. Tatarstan 23%
  65. Syria 23%
  66. Egypt 22%
  67. Georgia 22%
  68. Azerbaijan 22%
  69. Iraq 22%
  70. Montenegro 21%
  71. Morocco 21%
  72. Uzbekistan 20%
  73. Algeria 20%
  74. Palestine 19%
  75. India 19%
  76. Tunisia 18%
  77. Kazakhstan 18%
  78. Mordovia 17%
  79. Bahrain 17%
  80. Jordan 17%
  81. Kuwait 17%
  82. Afghanistan 16%
  83. Bashkortostan 16%
  84. Saudi Arabia 16%
  85. Qatar 16%
  86. Libya 16%
  87. United Arab Emirates 16%
  88. Chuvashia 15%
  89. Dagestan 15%
  90. Tajikistan 15%
  91. Adygea 14%
  92. Pakistan 13%
  93. Sudan 12%
  94. Oman 11%
  95. Yemen 11%
  96. Sri Lanka 11%
  97. Philippines 10%
  98. Chechnya 9%
  99. Indonesia 8%
  100. Nigeria 7%
  101. Cameroon 7%
  102. China 7%
  103. Mongolia 6%
  104. Somalia 5%
  105. Orstkhoy (Aosta Valley in FTDNA) 5%
  106. Ingushetia 5%
  107. Ghana 3%
  108. Karelia 3%
  109. Vietnam 3%
  110. South Korea 3%
  111. Japan 3%

England: mtDNA #

Distinctive branches

Branches found here far more often than worldwide: their share is more than 3× the world share. The multiplier is in brackets. Branches of at least 10 kits are included.

  • H83: 14 kits · 0.1% (95% confidence interval: 0–0%) (×4.4)
  • H3n: 10 kits · 0.1% (95% confidence interval: 0–0%) (×5.0)
  • A12a: 10 kits · 0.1% (95% confidence interval: 0–0%) (×3.9)
  • H47a: 13 kits · 0.1% (95% confidence interval: 0–0%) (×3.1)

Most similar countries

Countries whose mix of major branches looks most like this one. The number is similarity: 100% is the same mix, lower means less in common. Computed only for countries with 100+ kits.

0–28%29–51%52–73%74–86%87–97%Englandunder 100 kits
All 71 countries and regions by similarity
  1. United Kingdom 97%
  2. Ireland 95%
  3. Scotland 95%
  4. United States 95%
  5. Germany 95%
  6. Sweden 91%
  7. France 91%
  8. Norway 91%
  9. Netherlands 91%
  10. Wales 89%
  11. Switzerland 88%
  12. Northern Ireland 88%
  13. Denmark 87%
  14. Canada 87%
  15. Czech Republic 86%
  16. Poland 85%
  17. Belgium 84%
  18. Austria 84%
  19. Russia 83%
  20. Hungary 83%
  21. Slovakia 80%
  22. Italy 80%
  23. Australia 78%
  24. Ukraine 78%
  25. Portugal 76%
  26. Estonia 75%
  27. Finland 74%
  28. Slovenia 74%
  29. Croatia 73%
  30. Lithuania 72%
  31. Romania 72%
  32. Spain 71%
  33. Bulgaria 71%
  34. Serbia 70%
  35. United States (Native American) 69%
  36. Latvia 67%
  37. Belarus 67%
  38. Greece 66%
  39. Bosnia and Herzegovina 64%
  40. Moldova 57%
  41. Turkey 55%
  42. Algeria 54%
  43. Chechnya 51%
  44. Morocco 50%
  45. New Zealand 48%
  46. Syria 48%
  47. Armenia 47%
  48. Israel 46%
  49. Lebanon 44%
  50. South Africa 39%
  51. Brazil 37%
  52. Egypt 37%
  53. Cuba 36%
  54. Iraq 36%
  55. Iran 35%
  56. Saudi Arabia 33%
  57. United Arab Emirates 28%
  58. Kuwait 26%
  59. Argentina 24%
  60. Mexico 21%
  61. Dominican Republic 21%
  62. India 19%
  63. Puerto Rico 17%
  64. Canada (First Nations) 16%
  65. Jamaica 8%
  66. China 8%
  67. Chile 8%
  68. Colombia 5%
  69. Japan 3%
  70. South Korea 0%
  71. Philippines 0%
YFull

The same country on YFull #

The same country at the second company, YFull. Its samples are placed on the FTDNA tree by shared mutations, so the branches are comparable. FTDNA share on the left, YFull on the right, then the difference in percentage points. Republics and other sub-regions are taken out of the country, as at FTDNA. Starred branches are nearly empty at YFull: every test there is whole-genome and reaches the fine branches. Only YFull customers (YF number) are counted, no ancient DNA. YFull data of 2026-11-02. The tree shows only its top three levels.

Y-DNA

27,817
FTDNA
kits
1,939
YFull
samples
FTDNAYFull
FTDNA · YFull · Δ
R R-M207
64.8% · 55.7%−9.1
R1b-L51 R-L51
56.5% · 47.5%−9
P312 R-P312
29.4% · 32.1%+2.7
U106 R-U106
20.1% · 13.8%−6.4
R1a-M198 R-M198
4.0% · 6.4%+2.5
I I-L758
24.4% · 29.9%+5.4
I1 I-M253
15.4% · 19.3%+3.9
DF29 I-DF29
9.3% · 18.9%+9.5
I2 I-P215
8.4% · 10.5%+2.2
I2b I-M223
4.9% · 5.8%+0.9
E E-M96
3.4% · 6.2%+2.8
E1b1b-M35 E-M35
2.9% · 5.1%+2.2
J J-M304
3.0% · 3.6%+0.5
J2 J-M172
2.5% · 3.1%+0.7
G G-M201
2.9% · 2.4%−0.5

mtDNA

12,386
FTDNA
kits
388
YFull
samples
FTDNAYFull
FTDNA · YFull · Δ
44.3% · 43.6%−0.8
16.5% · 18.3%+1.8
3.1% · 2.1%−1
3.0% · 5.9%+3
2.5% · 2.3%−0.1
5.3% · 3.9%−1.4
3.8% · 4.9%+1.1
2.5% · 2.6%+0.1
2.5% · 0.8%−1.7
2.3% · 0.8%−1.5
2.5% · 1.8%−0.7
13.1% · 14.2%+1.1
U5a'b
8.5% · 9.8%+1.3
4.6% · 4.1%−0.5
3.9% · 5.7%+1.8
U2'3'4'7'8'9
4.2% · 4.1%0
10.6% · 9.0%−1.6
8.4% · 6.4%−2
5.4% · 3.6%−1.8
2.2% · 2.6%+0.4
10.2% · 10.1%−0.1
8.2% · 8.2%+0.1
7.1% · 5.9%−1.2
8.8% · 9.3%+0.5
7.0% · 7.7%+0.7
4.9% · 4.6%−0.3
3.4% · 2.8%−0.5
2.9% · 3.1%+0.2

The same country on the project maps

In the FTDNA geographic projects a member puts the place of their paternal or maternal ancestor on the map. Here those points are set against the public tree: solid bar the tree, hatched bar the points on the maps, copy of 2026-10-20. A person in several projects counts once. Branches as in the tree above: each counts every kit in it and in its sub-branches. Regions with a page of their own are not included here: they are counted apart.

Y-DNA FTDNA 27,817 · Projects 5,874

FTDNAProjects
FTDNA · Projects · Δ
R R-M207
64.8% · 66.6%+1.8
R1b-L51 R-L51
56.5% · 47.3%−9.1
P312 R-P312
29.4% · 26.4%−3.1
L21 R-L21
14.9% · 13.8%−1.2
DF13 R-DF13
12.3% · 12.1%−0.1
Z39589 R-Z39589
5.5% · 5.6%+0.1
DF27 R-DF27
7.1% · 6.0%−1.1
U106 R-U106
20.1% · 17.6%−2.5
L48 R-L48
9.1% · 8.2%−0.9
Z9 R-Z9
6.1% · 5.2%−0.9
I I-L758
24.4% · 22.8%−1.7
I1 I-M253
15.4% · 12.8%−2.6
DF29 I-DF29
9.3% · 9.7%+0.3
I2 I-P215
8.4% · 7.6%−0.7

mtDNA FTDNA 12,386 · Projects 2,557

FTDNAProjects
FTDNA · Projects · Δ
44.3% · 42.3%−2.1
16.5% · 12.8%−3.7
5.3% · 4.4%−0.9
13.1% · 13.9%+0.8
U5a'b
8.5% · 7.6%−0.9
10.6% · 10.6%0
8.4% · 8.0%−0.4
5.4% · 4.7%−0.7
10.2% · 9.9%−0.2
8.2% · 7.0%−1.2
7.1% · 5.6%−1.5
8.8% · 9.2%+0.4
7.0% · 6.2%−0.8
4.9% · 4.5%−0.4
6,083
Y-DNA · People on the map
5,874 of them have a branch of the tree; relatives with one ancestor at one place count as one, 5,970 such votes
79%
Y-DNA · SNP-confirmed
that many have the branch confirmed by an SNP test, the rest predicted from STRs
2,558
mtDNA · People on the map
2,557 of them have a branch of the tree; relatives with one ancestor at one place count as one, 2,545 such votes
83%
agreement with YFull · Y
how closely the Y tree branches match between FTDNA and YFull, each branch counted without its sub-branches. 100% is identical, below 80% is visibly different.
I-DF29 +9.5
gap to YFull · Y
the Y branch whose share differs most between the two companies: FTDNA 9.3%, YFull 18.9%
29% / 22%
reached the finest branch: YFull / FTDNA
share of YFull samples and FTDNA kits that reached the finest branch of the FTDNA tree. On average a YFull sample sits 38.9 branchings from the root, an FTDNA kit 34.5
22%
Y-DNA · on leaves
share of kits that reached the finest branch of the tree. The rest stopped at a broad branch: their test was not detailed enough.
37%
Big Y
rough share of kits with a Big Y test, a full read of the Y chromosome. It is estimated from the branches where the region's kits sit, so it is an estimate, not a count.
41%
mtDNA · on leaves
share of kits that reached the finest branch of the tree. The rest stopped at a broad branch: their test was not detailed enough.
0.45
mt to Y
mtDNA kits per one Y-DNA kit. Below 0.3 means the country tests almost only the paternal line.

New this month #

FTDNA: how much the kit count grew between the tree copies of 2026-10-09 and 2026-11-12. A kit that moved to a new sub-branch after refinement is not counted as new. YFull: samples YFull itself marks as new, in the copy of 2026-11-02; YFull drops the mark after a few weeks.

+41
Y-DNA, FTDNA
new kits, 2026-10-09 → 2026-11-12
+40
mtDNA, FTDNA
new kits, 2026-10-12 → 2026-11-11
+8
Y-DNA, YFull
new samples as of 2026-11-02
+1
mtDNA, YFull
new samples as of 2026-11-02

Y-DNA: branches that grew

mtDNA: branches that grew

New Y-DNA samples in YFull

New mtDNA samples in YFull

Subregions #

Each bar is all the kits of one place; a colour is a group of haplogroups. The “England” line holds kits that name only the country, without a region. A faded line has fewer than 20 kits; its shares are unreliable.

Y-DNA

R1b-P312R-Z381rest of RI1-DF29I-L460rest of IEother
England no region 27,817

mtDNA

H1H3H2rest of HU5brest of UJTKother
England no region 12,386
YFull

Peoples and languages on YFull #

Native language reported by YFull customers from this country. People from regions with a page of their own (republics, autonomies) are shown there. These are the testers' own answers, not a census.

YFull

Recent kin across borders #

Shared young paternal branches: YFull customers from this country and from the partner country have a common paternal-line ancestor no older than 500 years. The comparison accounts for how linked a country is abroad overall: shown are partners with more shared branches than its general openness would give. It reflects recent migration and shared ancestry, not ethnicity.

Recent kin across borders
Country shared branches expected × chance?
United States 72 14.7 4.9 unlikely by chance p < 0.001
Ireland 12 5.0 2.4 unlikely by chance p = 0.004
YFull

Paternal and maternal lines together #

Members of this people with both lines known on YFull. For each “Y branch × mt branch” combination, how many times it occurred and how many would be expected if the two lines had nothing to do with each other. Y and mt pairs → n=276

Notably above chance

Y × mt: line combinations · Notably above chance
Y mt pairs expected by chance × chance?
R1b-Z2534 H1e 5 0.1 46.00 unlikely by chance p < 0.001

Most frequent combinations

Y × mt: line combinations · Most frequent combinations
Y mt pairs expected by chance × chance?
R1b-Z2534 H1e 5 0.1 46.00 unlikely by chance p < 0.001
I1-Z59 X2b 4 0.4 11.04 unlikely by chance p < 0.001
R1a-M417 H13a 4 0.1 30.67 unlikely by chance p < 0.001
R1b-Z304 H7f 4 0.3 12.27 unlikely by chance p < 0.001
I1-DF29 HV1a 3 0.0 69.00 unlikely by chance p < 0.001
I1-Z59 H1c 3 1.3 2.37 could be chance p = 0.122
I1-Z59 T2b 3 1.3 2.37 could be chance p = 0.122
I2b-CTS616 J1c 3 1.1 2.72 could be chance p = 0.087

Ancient relatives of male lines #

Which cultures of the Copper Age and Early Bronze Age (4000–2000 BCE) the local male lines lead to most closely. The share is how many kits lead to a culture; the range is in brackets.

England Bell Beaker culture and Neolithic Scandinavian: 82.8% Bell Beaker culture and Neolithic Scandinavian ≈ 2,200–2,300 BCE 83% 17%
England Bell Beaker culture and Neolithic Scandinavian Bell Beaker culture and Neolithic Scandinavian · R1b: 59.7% R1b Bell Beaker culture and Neolithic Scandinavian: R1b → R1b 46.7% Bell Beaker culture and Neolithic Scandinavian: R1b → R1b 13.0% Bell Beaker culture and Neolithic Scandinavian · I1: 12.9% I1 Bell Beaker culture and Neolithic Scandinavian: I1 → I1 12.6% Bell Beaker culture and Neolithic Scandinavian: I1 → I 0.4% Bell Beaker culture and Neolithic Scandinavian · I2b: 3.4% Bell Beaker culture and Neolithic Scandinavian: I2b → I2b 2.4% Bell Beaker culture and Neolithic Scandinavian: I2b → I2b 1.0% Bell Beaker culture and Neolithic Scandinavian · R1a: 4.0% R1a Bell Beaker culture and Neolithic Scandinavian: R1a → R1a 3.7% Bell Beaker culture and Neolithic Scandinavian: R1a → R1a 0.3% Bell Beaker culture and Neolithic Scandinavian · G2a: 0.8% Bell Beaker culture and Neolithic Scandinavian: G2a → G2a 0.8% Bell Beaker culture and Neolithic Scandinavian · I2a: 0.4% Bell Beaker culture and Neolithic Scandinavian: I2a → I2a 0.4% Bell Beaker culture and Neolithic Scandinavian · I2: 0.9% Bell Beaker culture and Neolithic Scandinavian: I2 → I2 0.9% R1b 61% I1 15% I2b 5% R1a 4% E1b1b 3% I2a 2% … 6%
Left: the major branches through which the lines lead to a culture; right: all major branches. Grey: the part of a branch without ancient relatives of this era.
How it is counted
  • Branches of the era. We take the ancient samples whose date falls inside the era, and compare the lines as they stood 1,500 years before the era ends.
  • A culture’s profile is the share of its lines on those branches. The number of samples does not change a weight: a culture of seven men weighs as much as one of a hundred and twenty.
  • A shallow test. An ancient man typed above the cut is spread over the branches under his node, by how many men each holds now. Today’s kits are treated the same way.
  • Who is admitted. A culture takes part when its sharply typed men cover 25% of the population on their own: branch by branch we add the smaller of the two shares, the culture’s and the population’s. One dug within 550 km needs only 0.5%.
  • The shares. We pick the weights of the cultures so that their mixture comes as close as it can to today’s set of branches.
  • Look-alike cultures. When cultures share almost all their branches, the data cannot say whose kin the men are. So we do not split the share between them: they get one bar.
  • The range. We recount everything on random subsets of the samples. In brackets are the bounds the share keeps in nine runs out of ten. A share that can fall below 5%, or below half of itself, is not shown at all.

What it does not mean. This is kinship of male lines, not the origin of a people. The female lines say nothing here. Who takes a test is a matter of chance, so the shares compare between countries, not with a census.

Ancient samples

From excavations on this territory: 766 samples by Y-DNA and 214 samples by mtDNA. The oldest: 5,396 BCE, H11a.

Arras culture 226 · Medieval British 183 · Iron Age British 135 · Neolithic British Isles 53 · Bronze Age British Isles 47

All ancient samples →

Data on this page: FamilyTreeDNA Y tree, 12 November 2026: 27,817 kits; FamilyTreeDNA mtDNA tree, 11 November 2026: 12,386 kits; YFull Y tree, 2 November 2026: 1,939 samples; YFull mtDNA tree, 2 November 2026: 388 samples.

How to cite: ftdnastat, "England: Y-DNA and mtDNA haplogroups", https://ftdnastat.github.io/en/c/england/, data of 2026-11-14, build 20261114-18dba71.

The data is licensed under CC BY 4.0: take it, rework it, just credit ftdnastat.