England: haplogroups
FamilyTreeDNA has 27,817 kits with a Y-DNA result and 12,386 kits with mtDNA (mitochondrial DNA). On the paternal line the most common are R1b-L51 — 56%, I1 — 15% and I2 — 8%. On the maternal line the most common are H — 44%, U — 13% and T2 — 8%. YFull has 1,939 samples for Y from the same area, and its mix of major branches is broadly the same. The largest gap is I1-DF29: 9% on FTDNA against 19% on YFull.
Compare with…Paternal line · Y-DNA
27,817 kits · 30 branchesAmong the rest: Q 134, T 112, N 40, H 37, F 26, L 16, A 15, C 14, O 8, K 1.
Maternal line · mtDNA
12,386 kits · 30 branchesAmong the rest: HV 239, W 227, X 191, N 48, L 36, R 27, A 23, M 22, B 10, C 7, D 3, G 1, S 1.
Migration paths of the characteristic branches #
Paths of the region's main characteristic branches, as modelled by FamilyTreeDNA Discover, on one calendar clock: in each year a branch stands where its ancestral line was. Grey is a stretch of path shared by several branches; the large marker is the branch itself.
Show the mapHide the map The map unfolds by itself as you scroll down to it.
Loading the map…
- R-S1690 · 2%
- Shared trunk
- Territory: England
The time scale is logarithmic: the closer to the present, the longer a year takes.
England: Y-DNA #
Distinctive branches
Branches found here far more often than worldwide: their share is more than 3× the world share. The multiplier is in brackets. Branches of at least 10 kits are included.
Most similar countries
Countries whose mix of major branches looks most like this one. The number is similarity: 100% is the same mix, lower means less in common. Computed only for countries with 100+ kits.
All 111 countries and regions by similarity
- United Kingdom 98%
- United States 92%
- Netherlands 89%
- France 89%
- Germany 88%
- Wales 88%
- Canada 87%
- Scotland 87%
- Denmark 84%
- Belgium 83%
- Switzerland 79%
- Ireland 77%
- Northern Ireland 76%
- Australia 75%
- Portugal 68%
- Spain 68%
- Norway 67%
- Italy 65%
- United States (Native American) 65%
- Austria 65%
- Sweden 64%
- Brazil 63%
- Luxembourg 62%
- Czech Republic 60%
- Hungary 59%
- Puerto Rico 58%
- New Zealand 57%
- South Africa 55%
- Poland 54%
- Cuba 53%
- Mexico 53%
- Slovakia 49%
- Colombia 49%
- Slovenia 48%
- Romania 47%
- Greece 46%
- Jamaica 45%
- Ukraine 43%
- Argentina 43%
- Chile 43%
- Russia 43%
- Iceland 41%
- Bulgaria 40%
- Dominican Republic 39%
- Isle of Man 38%
- Italy (Sicily) 38%
- Lithuania 37%
- Croatia 37%
- Belarus 37%
- Serbia 36%
- Latvia 36%
- Macedonia 32%
- Turkey 31%
- Peru 31%
- Estonia 30%
- Israel 29%
- Albania 29%
- Moldova 29%
- Lebanon 28%
- Finland 26%
- Armenia 26%
- Bosnia and Herzegovina 25%
- Iran 25%
- Tatarstan 23%
- Syria 23%
- Egypt 22%
- Georgia 22%
- Azerbaijan 22%
- Iraq 22%
- Montenegro 21%
- Morocco 21%
- Uzbekistan 20%
- Algeria 20%
- Palestine 19%
- India 19%
- Tunisia 18%
- Kazakhstan 18%
- Mordovia 17%
- Bahrain 17%
- Jordan 17%
- Kuwait 17%
- Afghanistan 16%
- Bashkortostan 16%
- Saudi Arabia 16%
- Qatar 16%
- Libya 16%
- United Arab Emirates 16%
- Chuvashia 15%
- Dagestan 15%
- Tajikistan 15%
- Adygea 14%
- Pakistan 13%
- Sudan 12%
- Oman 11%
- Yemen 11%
- Sri Lanka 11%
- Philippines 10%
- Chechnya 9%
- Indonesia 8%
- Nigeria 7%
- Cameroon 7%
- China 7%
- Mongolia 6%
- Somalia 5%
- Orstkhoy (Aosta Valley in FTDNA) 5%
- Ingushetia 5%
- Ghana 3%
- Karelia 3%
- Vietnam 3%
- South Korea 3%
- Japan 3%
England: mtDNA #
Distinctive branches
Branches found here far more often than worldwide: their share is more than 3× the world share. The multiplier is in brackets. Branches of at least 10 kits are included.
- H83: 14 kits · 0.1% (95% confidence interval: 0–0%) (×4.4)
- H3n: 10 kits · 0.1% (95% confidence interval: 0–0%) (×5.0)
- A12a: 10 kits · 0.1% (95% confidence interval: 0–0%) (×3.9)
- H47a: 13 kits · 0.1% (95% confidence interval: 0–0%) (×3.1)
Most similar countries
Countries whose mix of major branches looks most like this one. The number is similarity: 100% is the same mix, lower means less in common. Computed only for countries with 100+ kits.
All 71 countries and regions by similarity
- United Kingdom 97%
- Ireland 95%
- Scotland 95%
- United States 95%
- Germany 95%
- Sweden 91%
- France 91%
- Norway 91%
- Netherlands 91%
- Wales 89%
- Switzerland 88%
- Northern Ireland 88%
- Denmark 87%
- Canada 87%
- Czech Republic 86%
- Poland 85%
- Belgium 84%
- Austria 84%
- Russia 83%
- Hungary 83%
- Slovakia 80%
- Italy 80%
- Australia 78%
- Ukraine 78%
- Portugal 76%
- Estonia 75%
- Finland 74%
- Slovenia 74%
- Croatia 73%
- Lithuania 72%
- Romania 72%
- Spain 71%
- Bulgaria 71%
- Serbia 70%
- United States (Native American) 69%
- Latvia 67%
- Belarus 67%
- Greece 66%
- Bosnia and Herzegovina 64%
- Moldova 57%
- Turkey 55%
- Algeria 54%
- Chechnya 51%
- Morocco 50%
- New Zealand 48%
- Syria 48%
- Armenia 47%
- Israel 46%
- Lebanon 44%
- South Africa 39%
- Brazil 37%
- Egypt 37%
- Cuba 36%
- Iraq 36%
- Iran 35%
- Saudi Arabia 33%
- United Arab Emirates 28%
- Kuwait 26%
- Argentina 24%
- Mexico 21%
- Dominican Republic 21%
- India 19%
- Puerto Rico 17%
- Canada (First Nations) 16%
- Jamaica 8%
- China 8%
- Chile 8%
- Colombia 5%
- Japan 3%
- South Korea 0%
- Philippines 0%
The same country on YFull #
The same country at the second company, YFull. Its samples are placed on the FTDNA tree by shared mutations, so the branches are comparable. FTDNA share on the left, YFull on the right, then the difference in percentage points. Republics and other sub-regions are taken out of the country, as at FTDNA. Starred branches are nearly empty at YFull: every test there is whole-genome and reaches the fine branches. Only YFull customers (YF number) are counted, no ancient DNA. YFull data of 2026-11-02. The tree shows only its top three levels.
Y-DNA
mtDNA
The same country on the project maps
Y-DNA FTDNA 27,817 · Projects 5,874
mtDNA FTDNA 12,386 · Projects 2,557
New this month #
FTDNA: how much the kit count grew between the tree copies of 2026-10-09 and 2026-11-12. A kit that moved to a new sub-branch after refinement is not counted as new. YFull: samples YFull itself marks as new, in the copy of 2026-11-02; YFull drops the mark after a few weeks.
Y-DNA: branches that grew
- I-Z2040: +3
- R-DF96: +3
- R-Z251: +3
- I-BY151*: +2
- I-CTS595: +2
- I-S2293: +2
- R-DF25: +2
- R-FTT1*: +2
- R-Z159: +2
- R-Z31*: +2
- R-Z367*: +2
- R-Z372: +2
- R-ZZ5_1*: +2
- A-PR2921* A (tree root): +1
- E-S2979: +1
- E-Z5018*: +1
- G-L1259* G2a-L1259: +1
- I-CTS6364*: +1
- I-CTS6433*: +1
- I-DF29* I1-DF29: +1
- I-L38 I2-L38: +1
- I-S7660: +1
- J-L26* J2a-L26: +1
- J-Z2217*: +1
- R-BY12480*: +1
- R-CTS4179: +1
- R-CTS7822 R1b-Z2110: +1
- R-DF19* R1b-DF19: +1
- R-DF21* R1b-DF21: +1
- R-DF49*: +1
- and 21 more
mtDNA: branches that grew
- T2b: +3
- T2f: +3
- U5a: +3
- H1: +2
- H1b: +2
- H1c: +2
- J1c: +2
- K2a: +2
- U5b: +2
- H11a: +1
- H13a: +1
- H17: +1
- H1g: +1
- H1i: +1
- H1o: +1
- H3a: +1
- H3g: +1
- H48: +1
- H4a: +1
- H56: +1
- H5a: +1
- H7d: +1
- HV6: +1
- HV9: +1
- I1a: +1
- J2a: +1
- U4b: +1
- U7b: +1
- V: +1
- V2c: +1
- and 2 more
New Y-DNA samples in YFull
New mtDNA samples in YFull
- J1b1a1-a · ancient
Subregions #
Each bar is all the kits of one place; a colour is a group of haplogroups. The “England” line holds kits that name only the country, without a region. A faded line has fewer than 20 kits; its shares are unreliable.
Y-DNA
mtDNA
Peoples and languages on YFull #
Native language reported by YFull customers from this country. People from regions with a page of their own (republics, autonomies) are shown there. These are the testers' own answers, not a census.
- English 181 / 67
Recent kin across borders #
Shared young paternal branches: YFull customers from this country and from the partner country have a common paternal-line ancestor no older than 500 years. The comparison accounts for how linked a country is abroad overall: shown are partners with more shared branches than its general openness would give. It reflects recent migration and shared ancestry, not ethnicity.
| Country | shared branches | expected | × | chance? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 72 | 14.7 | 4.9 | unlikely by chance p < 0.001 |
| Ireland | 12 | 5.0 | 2.4 | unlikely by chance p = 0.004 |
Paternal and maternal lines together #
Members of this people with both lines known on YFull. For each “Y branch × mt branch” combination, how many times it occurred and how many would be expected if the two lines had nothing to do with each other. Y and mt pairs → n=276
Notably above chance
| Y | mt | pairs | expected by chance | × | chance? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1b-Z2534 | H1e | 5 | 0.1 | 46.00 | unlikely by chance p < 0.001 |
Most frequent combinations
| Y | mt | pairs | expected by chance | × | chance? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1b-Z2534 | H1e | 5 | 0.1 | 46.00 | unlikely by chance p < 0.001 |
| I1-Z59 | X2b | 4 | 0.4 | 11.04 | unlikely by chance p < 0.001 |
| R1a-M417 | H13a | 4 | 0.1 | 30.67 | unlikely by chance p < 0.001 |
| R1b-Z304 | H7f | 4 | 0.3 | 12.27 | unlikely by chance p < 0.001 |
| I1-DF29 | HV1a | 3 | 0.0 | 69.00 | unlikely by chance p < 0.001 |
| I1-Z59 | H1c | 3 | 1.3 | 2.37 | could be chance p = 0.122 |
| I1-Z59 | T2b | 3 | 1.3 | 2.37 | could be chance p = 0.122 |
| I2b-CTS616 | J1c | 3 | 1.1 | 2.72 | could be chance p = 0.087 |
Ancient relatives of male lines #
Which cultures of the Copper Age and Early Bronze Age (4000–2000 BCE) the local male lines lead to most closely. The share is how many kits lead to a culture; the range is in brackets.
- Bell Beaker culture and Neolithic Scandinavianshared branches: R-P310, I-S63, R-M41783%(65%–87%)
- No close ancient relativesalso cultures under 3% and kits with shallow tests17%
How it is counted
- Branches of the era. We take the ancient samples whose date falls inside the era, and compare the lines as they stood 1,500 years before the era ends.
- A culture’s profile is the share of its lines on those branches. The number of samples does not change a weight: a culture of seven men weighs as much as one of a hundred and twenty.
- A shallow test. An ancient man typed above the cut is spread over the branches under his node, by how many men each holds now. Today’s kits are treated the same way.
- Who is admitted. A culture takes part when its sharply typed men cover 25% of the population on their own: branch by branch we add the smaller of the two shares, the culture’s and the population’s. One dug within 550 km needs only 0.5%.
- The shares. We pick the weights of the cultures so that their mixture comes as close as it can to today’s set of branches.
- Look-alike cultures. When cultures share almost all their branches, the data cannot say whose kin the men are. So we do not split the share between them: they get one bar.
- The range. We recount everything on random subsets of the samples. In brackets are the bounds the share keeps in nine runs out of ten. A share that can fall below 5%, or below half of itself, is not shown at all.
What it does not mean. This is kinship of male lines, not the origin of a people. The female lines say nothing here. Who takes a test is a matter of chance, so the shares compare between countries, not with a census.
Ancient samples
Arras culture 226 · Medieval British 183 · Iron Age British 135 · Neolithic British Isles 53 · Bronze Age British Isles 47
All ancient samples →Data on this page: FamilyTreeDNA Y tree, 12 November 2026: 27,817 kits; FamilyTreeDNA mtDNA tree, 11 November 2026: 12,386 kits; YFull Y tree, 2 November 2026: 1,939 samples; YFull mtDNA tree, 2 November 2026: 388 samples.
How to cite: ftdnastat, "England: Y-DNA and mtDNA haplogroups", https://ftdnastat.github.io/en/c/england/, data of 2026-11-14, build 20261114-18dba71.
The data is licensed under CC BY 4.0: take it, rework it, just credit ftdnastat.