ftdnastat Русский

About the data

How the site works: sources, updates and calculations in detail →

Where the data comes from: the public FamilyTreeDNA trees, Y-DNA Haplotree and mtDNA (mitochondrial DNA) Haplotree, and the FTDNA Discover service, which gives branch ages. Copies of the trees are downloaded weekly; after a check, the site is rebuilt from scratch.

A kit is one FTDNA test, nearly always one person; the word is FTDNA's own name for a test. A sample is a YFull entry or ancient DNA; neither has an FTDNA kit. A branch is a node of the haplogroup tree with all its sub-branches; a branch page's heading calls it a haplogroup, as people usually search for it.

A kit's country is the homeland of the earliest known ancestor on that line, and the FTDNA customer enters it themselves. It is not a place of residence and not a random sample of the population. The US, Britain and Scandinavia are over-represented, Africa and Asia are nearly empty, and some countries are skewed by diaspora. For example, on the maternal line Spain is roughly 18% Native American because Latin Americans report their colonial ancestors' country; Belarus and Lithuania are 15–20% Ashkenazi.

Kits with no country, or marked Unknown Origin, are not counted: 61% of all Y-DNA kits and 73% of mtDNA kits. They contain more African lineages than kits with a country, so the world share of haplogroup L on this site is understated.

One country is deliberately relabelled: “Italy (Aosta Valley)” is shown as Orstkhoy, a people closely related to the Chechens and Ingush who report this region because of a similar flag. Details on its page.

Regions are counted separately from their country: “Russia (Republic of Dagestan)” is not part of “Russian Federation”, “Spain (Catalonia)” is not part of “Spain”. A region's page links to its country.

A short name with no refinement (J-M172, H, I2) means the test did not reach the fine branches: on Y-DNA an STR test or an old SNP pack, on mtDNA an HVR test without a full read. In the major-branch list such kits are gathered under an asterisk: they sit on the branch but fall into none of its major sub-branches.

A branch and its sub-branch never stand in one list as equals. Either it is a tree, where a branch includes all its sub-branches, or a list where every kit is counted once and the remainder on the branch itself is marked with an asterisk.

Branch age is how many years ago the common ancestor of all its testers lived (TMRCA), as estimated by FTDNA Discover. We take the midpoint of the estimate and round it to a hundred years; above 10,000 years we round up to a whole thousand. mt branch ages come from FTDNA's Mitotree where the branch exists there.

One set of thresholds for the whole site: countries under 50 kits are flagged as small and left out of the findings; similar countries are computed from 100 kits; a distinctive branch needs at least 10 kits.

Where a branch is “most often” found is not decided by the bare share. A country must give at least 5 of the branch's kits, and countries are compared by the lower bound of the 95% Wilson interval, so a sample of a hundred and fifty kits does not beat a large one at an almost equal share. On the bars of country pages and in the country table of a branch page, shares of small samples (under 100 kits) are rounded to whole percent, and where a country has fewer than 5 of the branch's kits a count is shown: “1 of 52”.

Macro-haplogroup colours

Colour marks the macro-haplogroup, the haplogroup's first letter; rare ones are grey.

Y-DNA

RIJENGQTOCLDABHKFSMPother

mtDNA

HUTJKVLIABDHVCNMXFRWZother

Population #

The “kits per 100,000 men” card on a country or region page divides the kits with a country by the male population: countries from the UN (World Population Prospects 2024, estimate for 2023), Russian regions from the 2021 census, other regions from Wikidata with their country's share of men. A region's kits also count towards its country here, since the country's population includes them; England, Scotland and Wales stand among the countries. It measures how well a country's branches are covered by tests, not the share of residents who tested: descendants of emigrants also name the ancestor's homeland, so countries of emigration rank higher than their own population would give. No card for entities under 50 kits or 50,000 people, nor for FTDNA samples without a territory of their own — First Nations, Druze, Cornish.

Colour is Y-DNA kits per 100,000 men. Hover over a country or tap it.

YFull data #

The second source is the public YFull trees (Y and mt), copy of 2 November 2026, refreshed monthly. YFull is a paid analysis of the full Y chromosome and the full mtDNA, so its customers are even more of enthusiasts and project members than FTDNA's. Saudi Arabia, for example, contributes more samples there than any other country.

Comparisons with FTDNA use only YFull customers (samples with a YF number) and only living people. Ancient DNA and samples from scientific papers and the GenBank database are excluded, because FTDNA counts customers only. For mtDNA fewer than a third of YFull samples qualify, so maternal-line comparisons are thinner.

The YFull and FTDNA trees branch differently and name branches after different mutations. To compare them, every YFull sample is placed on the FTDNA tree by mutations the two trees share: 87% of YFull branches find their FTDNA branch directly, the rest through the nearest branch above for which a match was found. Shares are then computed the same way as for FTDNA kits.

Country and region on YFull, as on FTDNA, are given by the tested person. YFull regions are linked to FTDNA pages by hand: republics of Russia, Spanish autonomies (through provinces), regions of Italy, parts of the United Kingdom. Samples from a region that has its own FTDNA page are taken out of the country.

Language on YFull is what the tested person named as their native language (ISO 639-3 code); FTDNA has no such field. Language is not the same as people or region: Chechens of Jordan are counted with Chechens of Chechnya, and “Arabic” spans every Arab country.

TheYtree #

A third age estimate for Y branches comes from the Chinese tree TheYtree (theytree.com), copy of 14 November 2026. It holds 43,033 samples, and the branches of haplogroup O are far better covered there than at FamilyTreeDNA and YFull. A branch of this site is matched to a TheYtree node by SNP, so the node name may differ. Its age and sample count appear on the branch page when the node holds more than 50 samples.

How much data #

FamilyTreeDNA: Y tree of 12 November 2026, mt tree of 11 November 2026

FTDNA Discover

Maps of the FTDNA geographic projects: copy of 20 October 2026

YFull: copy of 2 November 2026, trees YTree 14.07.00 and MTree 1.02.24111

TheYtree: copy of 14 November 2026

Y-tree nodes by haplogroup

A node belongs to the haplogroup its name starts with: R-M269 to R, A00 to A. Trunk nodes named by several letters (BT, CT, GHIJK) get a row of their own.

Y-tree nodes by haplogroup
Haplogroup FamilyTreeDNA Discover YFull
A 363 362 186
B 352 351 172
C 1,077 1,077 578
D 208 207 137
E 8,633 8,599 5,070
F 40 40 7
G 3,691 3,675 1,845
H 484 481 302
I 16,393 16,373 5,616
J 16,111 16,066 10,777
K 28 28 14
L 926 923 598
M 60 60 12
N 4,954 4,934 1,510
O 1,926 1,925 1,650
P 26 26 7
Q 1,716 1,709 746
R 52,632 52,512 13,816
S 93 93 12
T 1,537 1,530 932
Trunk 11 11 11
Total 111,261 110,982 43,998

The ypredictor tool #

Sister project ypredictor.github.io: paste your FTDNA STR markers to get a predicted Y-tree branch and your closest matches. Match countries there link back to pages of this site.

How accurate the predictor is #

Before each release the predictor is checked on the five clades it is tuned for. If errors pass a threshold, the new version does not go out. Latest check, 11 November 2026:

How we searched

We take the clade's kits whose lab branch is at least 5 tree steps deep. For each we remove the kit itself from the voters and predict its branch from its marker neighbours by the predictor's own rule, knowing from the lab answer that the kit is from this clade. The kit's relatives stay in the base and vote, so for a stranger with no kin in the base accuracy is lower. An answer is right when it lies on the lab branch's line: the same branch, above or below it; another line is an error. The second check compares with FTDNA geographic project maps, where a member's branch is confirmed; short confirmed branches count there too, so the kits of the two checks differ.

The data is licensed under CC BY 4.0: take it, rework it, just credit ftdnastat.