ftdnastat Русский

Denmark: haplogroups

FamilyTreeDNA has 1,635 kits with a Y-DNA result and 1,118 kits with mtDNA (mitochondrial DNA). On the paternal line the most common are R1b-L51 — 35%, I1 — 33% and R1a-M198 — 10%. On the maternal line the most common are H — 44%, U — 14% and T2 — 10%. YFull has 102 samples for Y from the same area, and its mix of major branches is broadly the same. The largest gap is R1b-P312: 12% on FTDNA against 21% on YFull.

Compare with…
55.3
Y-DNA · kits per 100,000 men
rank 18 of 123 among countries. About 3.0 million men (UN, 2023). A kit's country is the ancestor's homeland, not where the tester lives
18.8
mtDNA · kits per 100,000 people
rank 11 of 93 among countries. About 5.9 million people (UN, 2023)

Mitotree, the mt tree of FTDNA Discover, has about 1,846 more samples from here that the public mt tree lacks: mostly academic studies, GenBank among them (copy of 11 November 2026). This page is built from the public FTDNA tree.

Paternal line · Y-DNA

1,635 kits · 30 branches
Main branches of the Y tree. Each branch counts every kit in it and in its sub-branches; sub-branches are indented. Age is how many years ago the branch's common ancestor lived (TMRCA).
778 · 47.6% 28k years
605 · 37.0% 6,500 years
567 · 34.7% 6,100 years
316 · 19.3% 5,000 years
139 · 8.5% 4,500 years
93 · 5.7% 4,200 years
39 · 2.4% 4,300 years
199 · 12.2% 4,900 years
58 · 3.5% 4,700 years
44 · 2.7% 4,600 years
52 · 3.2% 4,700 years
38 · 2.3% 4,600 years
41 · 2.5% 4,700 years
163 · 10.0% 8,500 years
118 · 7.2% 4,800 years
52 · 3.2% 4,200 years
684 · 41.8% 35k years
545 · 33.3% 20k years
400 · 24.5% 4,500 years
171 · 10.5% 4,500 years
136 · 8.3% 4,300 years
164 · 10.0% 3,900 years
128 · 7.8% 3,800 years
134 · 8.2% 25k years
94 · 5.7% 17k years
76 · 4.6% 13k years
42 · 2.6% 52k years
37 · 2.3% 25k years
40 · 2.4% 30k years
37 · 2.3% 28k years
other
91 · 5.6%

Among the rest: G 33, N 26, Q 18, T 12, F 1, H 1.

Maternal line · mtDNA

1,118 kits · 30 branches
Main mt-tree branches grouped by letter, sub-branches indented. Each branch counts every kit in it and in its sub-branches. Age is how many years ago the branch's common foremother lived, from FTDNA data where available.
496 · 44.4% 11k years
188 · 16.8% 7,900 years
61 · 5.5% 5,300 years
39 · 3.5% 4,800 years
25 · 2.2%
51 · 4.6% 9,300 years
48 · 4.3% 8,000 years
38 · 3.4% 6,700 years
37 · 3.3% 8,400 years
24 · 2.1% 7,700 years
30 · 2.7% 6,800 years
29 · 2.6% 7,900 years
158 · 14.1% 51k years
U5a'b
90 · 8.1% 30k years
52 · 4.7% 21k years
44 · 3.9% 13k years
38 · 3.4% 25k years
U2'3'4'7'8'9
65 · 5.8% 50k years
32 · 2.9% 22k years
130 · 11.6% 20k years
110 · 9.8% 15k years
62 · 5.5% 8,500 years
104 · 9.3% 35k years
82 · 7.3% 28k years
64 · 5.7% 13k years
98 · 8.8% 29k years
79 · 7.1% 23k years
40 · 3.6% 11k years
38 · 3.4% 7,500 years
37 · 3.3% 17k years
other
57 · 5.1%

Among the rest: W 16, HV 14, X 10, C 4, N 4, A 4, L 2, M 1, G 1, R 1.

Migration paths of the characteristic branches #

Paths of the region's main characteristic branches, as modelled by FamilyTreeDNA Discover, on one calendar clock: in each year a branch stands where its ancestral line was. Grey is a stretch of path shared by several branches; the large marker is the branch itself. Above the map you can pick the paternal line (Y-DNA) or the maternal one (mtDNA).

Show the mapHide the map The map unfolds by itself as you scroll down to it.

Loading the map…

The time scale is logarithmic: the closer to the present, the longer a year takes.

Denmark: Y-DNA #

Distinctive branches

Branches found here far more often than worldwide: their share is more than 3× the world share. The multiplier is in brackets. Branches of at least 10 kits are included.

  • I-S7660: 55 kits · 3.4% (95% confidence interval: 3–4%) (×7.4) 2,900 years
  • I-P109: 88 kits · 5.4% (95% confidence interval: 4–7%) (×6.3) 3,600 years
  • I-M253 I1: 545 kits · 33.3% (95% confidence interval: 31–36%) (×3.1) 20k years
  • I-S63: 486 kits · 29.7% (95% confidence interval: 28–32%) (×3.1) 4,500 years
  • I-Z2535: 41 kits · 2.5% (95% confidence interval: 2–3%) (×5.2) 3,800 years
  • I-Z2040: 39 kits · 2.4% (95% confidence interval: 2–3%) (×5.1) 4,000 years
  • I-CTS6364: 194 kits · 11.9% (95% confidence interval: 10–14%) (×3.2) 4,200 years
  • I-L22 I1-L22: 164 kits · 10.0% (95% confidence interval: 9–12%) (×3.3) 3,900 years

Most similar countries

Countries whose mix of major branches looks most like this one. The number is similarity: 100% is the same mix, lower means less in common. Computed only for countries with 100+ kits.

1–12%13–19%20–38%39–54%55–84%Denmarkunder 100 kits
All 112 countries and regions by similarity
  1. England 84%
  2. Netherlands 84%
  3. Germany 83%
  4. United Kingdom 82%
  5. Sweden 79%
  6. United States 76%
  7. Norway 76%
  8. Belgium 75%
  9. France 71%
  10. Switzerland 71%
  11. Canada 71%
  12. Scotland 70%
  13. Wales 67%
  14. Austria 62%
  15. Australia 62%
  16. Czech Republic 61%
  17. Northern Ireland 59%
  18. Hungary 58%
  19. Poland 57%
  20. Ireland 56%
  21. England (Cornish) 55%
  22. United States (Native American) 54%
  23. Italy 54%
  24. Portugal 52%
  25. Luxembourg 51%
  26. Slovakia 51%
  27. Spain 51%
  28. Slovenia 48%
  29. Brazil 47%
  30. Russia 47%
  31. South Africa 47%
  32. Romania 45%
  33. Iceland 45%
  34. Estonia 45%
  35. Ukraine 44%
  36. Puerto Rico 44%
  37. New Zealand 44%
  38. Cuba 41%
  39. Greece 40%
  40. Croatia 40%
  41. Mexico 40%
  42. Bulgaria 40%
  43. Lithuania 39%
  44. Latvia 38%
  45. Belarus 38%
  46. Serbia 37%
  47. Jamaica 37%
  48. Finland 35%
  49. Colombia 35%
  50. Macedonia 33%
  51. Argentina 32%
  52. Bosnia and Herzegovina 31%
  53. Italy (Sicily) 30%
  54. Isle of Man 30%
  55. Chile 29%
  56. Moldova 28%
  57. Albania 28%
  58. Dominican Republic 28%
  59. Tatarstan 27%
  60. Mordovia 27%
  61. Turkey 27%
  62. Montenegro 24%
  63. Israel 24%
  64. Peru 23%
  65. Lebanon 22%
  66. Chuvashia 22%
  67. Armenia 20%
  68. Iran 19%
  69. Bashkortostan 19%
  70. Syria 19%
  71. Azerbaijan 18%
  72. Georgia 18%
  73. Egypt 18%
  74. Morocco 17%
  75. Iraq 16%
  76. Kazakhstan 16%
  77. Uzbekistan 15%
  78. Algeria 15%
  79. India 15%
  80. Tunisia 15%
  81. Palestine 14%
  82. Dagestan 14%
  83. Afghanistan 14%
  84. Bahrain 13%
  85. Jordan 13%
  86. Kuwait 13%
  87. Adygea 13%
  88. Saudi Arabia 13%
  89. Qatar 12%
  90. Libya 12%
  91. United Arab Emirates 12%
  92. Tajikistan 11%
  93. Pakistan 11%
  94. Karelia 10%
  95. Sri Lanka 9%
  96. Oman 9%
  97. Sudan 9%
  98. Yemen 8%
  99. Chechnya 7%
  100. Indonesia 7%
  101. Philippines 7%
  102. Nigeria 6%
  103. Mongolia 5%
  104. China 5%
  105. Orstkhoy (Aosta Valley in FTDNA) 4%
  106. Cameroon 4%
  107. Somalia 4%
  108. Ingushetia 3%
  109. Ghana 3%
  110. Japan 2%
  111. South Korea 2%
  112. Vietnam 1%

Denmark: mtDNA #

Distinctive branches

Branches found here far more often than worldwide: their share is more than 3× the world share. The multiplier is in brackets. Branches of at least 10 kits are included.

  • I1f: 10 kits · 0.9% (95% confidence interval: 0–2%) (×37.8)
  • T2f: 22 kits · 2.0% (95% confidence interval: 1–3%) (×3.3)
  • H7b: 12 kits · 1.1% (95% confidence interval: 1–2%) (×3.8)
  • I4a: 15 kits · 1.3% (95% confidence interval: 1–2%) (×3.2)

Most similar countries

Countries whose mix of major branches looks most like this one. The number is similarity: 100% is the same mix, lower means less in common. Computed only for countries with 100+ kits.

0–28%29–47%48–68%69–80%81–88%Denmarkunder 100 kits
All 71 countries and regions by similarity
  1. Sweden 88%
  2. Germany 88%
  3. England 87%
  4. United Kingdom 87%
  5. Scotland 85%
  6. Norway 85%
  7. Netherlands 85%
  8. Ireland 84%
  9. United States 84%
  10. Switzerland 83%
  11. Wales 83%
  12. France 82%
  13. Czech Republic 82%
  14. Northern Ireland 80%
  15. Austria 80%
  16. Poland 79%
  17. Belgium 79%
  18. Canada 79%
  19. Russia 77%
  20. Hungary 77%
  21. Slovakia 76%
  22. Estonia 76%
  23. Australia 73%
  24. Finland 73%
  25. Slovenia 73%
  26. Ukraine 73%
  27. Italy 71%
  28. Portugal 69%
  29. Lithuania 68%
  30. Croatia 67%
  31. Romania 67%
  32. Serbia 67%
  33. Bulgaria 66%
  34. Latvia 64%
  35. Belarus 63%
  36. Spain 63%
  37. Greece 63%
  38. Bosnia and Herzegovina 62%
  39. United States (Native American) 62%
  40. Moldova 54%
  41. Chechnya 51%
  42. Turkey 51%
  43. Algeria 47%
  44. Armenia 45%
  45. Syria 43%
  46. New Zealand 43%
  47. Israel 41%
  48. Lebanon 41%
  49. Morocco 41%
  50. South Africa 37%
  51. Iran 36%
  52. Iraq 35%
  53. Cuba 34%
  54. Brazil 34%
  55. Egypt 32%
  56. Saudi Arabia 31%
  57. United Arab Emirates 28%
  58. Kuwait 26%
  59. Argentina 23%
  60. Dominican Republic 21%
  61. Mexico 19%
  62. India 18%
  63. Puerto Rico 16%
  64. Canada (First Nations) 14%
  65. China 8%
  66. Chile 6%
  67. Jamaica 6%
  68. Colombia 3%
  69. Japan 3%
  70. South Korea 1%
  71. Philippines 0%
YFull

The same country on YFull #

The same country at the second company, YFull. Its samples are placed on the FTDNA tree by shared mutations, so the branches are comparable. FTDNA share on the left, YFull on the right, then the difference in percentage points. Republics and other sub-regions are taken out of the country, as at FTDNA. Starred branches are nearly empty at YFull: every test there is whole-genome and reaches the fine branches. Only YFull customers (YF number) are counted, no ancient DNA. YFull data of 2026-11-02. The tree shows only its top three levels.

Y-DNA

1,635
FTDNA
kits
102
YFull
samples
FTDNAYFull
FTDNA · YFull · Δ
R R-M207
47.6% · 47.1%−0.5
R1b-M269 R-M269
37.0% · 36.3%−0.7
L51 R-L51
34.7% · 36.3%+1.6
R1a-M198 R-M198
10.0% · 10.8%+0.8
Z282 R-Z282
7.2% · 10.8%+3.6
I I-L758
41.8% · 42.2%+0.3
I1 I-M253
33.3% · 32.4%−1
DF29 I-DF29
24.5% · 31.4%+6.9
I2 I-P215
8.2% · 9.8%+1.6
I2b I-M223
5.7% · 6.9%+1.1
E E-M96
2.6% · 2.9%+0.4
E1b1b-M35 E-M35
2.3% · 2.9%+0.7
J J-M304
2.4% · 4.9%+2.5
J2 J-M172
2.3% · 4.9%+2.6

mtDNA

1,118
FTDNA
kits
66
YFull
samples
FTDNAYFull
FTDNA · YFull · Δ
44.4% · 40.9%−3.5
16.8% · 15.2%−1.7
5.5% · 3.0%−2.4
3.5% · 1.5%−2
2.2% · 1.5%−0.7
4.6% · 7.6%+3
4.3% · 7.6%+3.3
3.4% · 1.5%−1.9
3.3% · 1.5%−1.8
2.1% · 0.0%−2.1
2.7% · 3.0%+0.3
2.6% · 1.5%−1.1
14.1% · 10.6%−3.5
U5a'b
8.1% · 3.0%−5
4.7% · 1.5%−3.1
3.4% · 1.5%−1.9
U2'3'4'7'8'9
5.8% · 7.6%+1.8
2.9% · 3.0%+0.2
11.6% · 16.7%+5
9.8% · 16.7%+6.8
5.5% · 12.1%+6.6
9.3% · 10.6%+1.3
7.3% · 10.6%+3.3
5.7% · 9.1%+3.4
8.8% · 15.2%+6.4
7.1% · 12.1%+5.1
3.6% · 3.0%−0.5
3.4% · 1.5%−1.9
3.3% · 3.0%−0.3

The same country on the project maps

In the FTDNA geographic projects a member puts the place of their paternal or maternal ancestor on the map. Here those points are set against the public tree: solid bar the tree, hatched bar the points on the maps, copy of 2026-10-20. A person in several projects counts once. Branches as in the tree above: each counts every kit in it and in its sub-branches.

Y-DNA FTDNA 1,635 · Projects 564

FTDNAProjects
FTDNA · Projects · Δ
R R-M207
47.6% · 52.1%+4.5
R1b-M269 R-M269
37.0% · 41.5%+4.5
L51 R-L51
34.7% · 33.0%−1.7
U106 R-U106
19.3% · 17.9%−1.4
L48 R-L48
8.5% · 8.7%+0.2
P312 R-P312
12.2% · 11.9%−0.3
R1a-M198 R-M198
10.0% · 10.3%+0.3
I I-L758
41.8% · 39.2%−2.7
I1 I-M253
33.3% · 26.1%−7.3
DF29 I-DF29
24.5% · 20.0%−4.4
Z58 I-Z58
10.5% · 9.9%−0.5
Z59 I-Z59
8.3% · 7.8%−0.5
L22 I-L22
10.0% · 6.7%−3.3
I2 I-P215
8.2% · 6.6%−1.6

mtDNA FTDNA 1,118 · Projects 410

FTDNAProjects
FTDNA · Projects · Δ
44.4% · 44.4%0
16.8% · 14.1%−2.7
5.5% · 3.9%−1.6
14.1% · 15.1%+1
U5a'b
8.1% · 5.6%−2.4
U2'3'4'7'8'9
5.8% · 6.6%+0.8
11.6% · 9.5%−2.1
9.8% · 7.6%−2.3
5.5% · 4.1%−1.4
9.3% · 10.5%+1.2
7.3% · 6.6%−0.7
5.7% · 4.9%−0.8
8.8% · 10.2%+1.5
7.1% · 5.6%−1.5
595
Y-DNA · People on the map
564 of them have a branch of the tree; relatives with one ancestor at one place count as one, 586 such votes
77%
Y-DNA · SNP-confirmed
that many have the branch confirmed by an SNP test, the rest predicted from STRs
411
mtDNA · People on the map
410 of them have a branch of the tree; relatives with one ancestor at one place count as one, 408 such votes
82%
agreement with YFull · Y
how closely the Y tree branches match between FTDNA and YFull, each branch counted without its sub-branches. 100% is identical, below 80% is visibly different.
R-P312 +8.4
gap to YFull · Y
the Y branch whose share differs most between the two companies: FTDNA 12.2%, YFull 20.6%
24% / 16%
reached the finest branch: YFull / FTDNA
share of YFull samples and FTDNA kits that reached the finest branch of the FTDNA tree. On average a YFull sample sits 37.1 branchings from the root, an FTDNA kit 32.2
16%
Y-DNA · on leaves
share of kits that reached the finest branch of the tree. The rest stopped at a broad branch: their test was not detailed enough.
28%
Big Y
rough share of kits with a Big Y test, a full read of the Y chromosome. It is estimated from the branches where the region's kits sit, so it is an estimate, not a count.
44%
mtDNA · on leaves
share of kits that reached the finest branch of the tree. The rest stopped at a broad branch: their test was not detailed enough.
0.68
mt to Y
mtDNA kits per one Y-DNA kit. Below 0.3 means the country tests almost only the paternal line.

New this month #

FTDNA: how much the kit count grew between the tree copies of 2026-10-09 and 2026-11-12. A kit that moved to a new sub-branch after refinement is not counted as new. YFull: samples YFull itself marks as new, in the copy of 2026-11-02; YFull drops the mark after a few weeks.

+1
Y-DNA, FTDNA
new kits, 2026-10-09 → 2026-11-12
+1
mtDNA, FTDNA
new kits, 2026-10-12 → 2026-11-11

Y-DNA: branches that grew

mtDNA: branches that grew

YFull

Regions on YFull #

Regions that cannot be picked at FTDNA but are reported by YFull customers. Regions with 20 or more samples are shown; modern YFull customers only. YFull regions →

Regions on YFull
Country / region Y mt Leading
Sjaelland DK-85 27 18 R-L51 R1b-L51 59%, I-DF29 I1-DF29 19%, R-Z282 R1a-Z282 15%
Syddanmark DK-83 23 7 I-DF29 I1-DF29 35%, R-P312 R1b-P312 22%, R-Z282 R1a-Z282 17%
YFull

Peoples and languages on YFull #

Native language reported by YFull customers from this country. People from regions with a page of their own (republics, autonomies) are shown there. These are the testers' own answers, not a census.

Ancient relatives of male lines #

Which cultures of the Copper Age and Early Bronze Age (4000–2000 BCE) the local male lines lead to most closely. The share is how many kits lead to a culture; the range is in brackets.

Denmark Neolithic Scandinavian and Bell Beaker culture: 84.1% Neolithic Scandinavian and Bell Beaker culture ≈ 2,200–2,500 BCE 84% 16%
Denmark Neolithic Scandinavian and Bell Beaker culture Neolithic Scandinavian and Bell Beaker culture · R1b: 36.8% R1b Neolithic Scandinavian and Bell Beaker culture: R1b → R1b 27.9% Neolithic Scandinavian and Bell Beaker culture: R1b → R1b 8.9% Neolithic Scandinavian and Bell Beaker culture · I1: 30.1% I1 Neolithic Scandinavian and Bell Beaker culture: I1 → I1 30.1% Neolithic Scandinavian and Bell Beaker culture · R1a: 10.0% R1a Neolithic Scandinavian and Bell Beaker culture: R1a → R1a 10.0% Neolithic Scandinavian and Bell Beaker culture · I2b: 4.9% I2b Neolithic Scandinavian and Bell Beaker culture: I2b → I2b 4.9% Neolithic Scandinavian and Bell Beaker culture · G2a: 0.3% Neolithic Scandinavian and Bell Beaker culture: G2a → G2a 0.3% Neolithic Scandinavian and Bell Beaker culture · I2: 1.0% Neolithic Scandinavian and Bell Beaker culture: I2 → I2 1.0% Neolithic Scandinavian and Bell Beaker culture · I2a: 0.3% Neolithic Scandinavian and Bell Beaker culture: I2a → I2a 0.3% R1b 37% I1 33% R1a 10% I2b 6% G2a 2% … 6%
Left: the major branches through which the lines lead to a culture; right: all major branches. Grey: the part of a branch without ancient relatives of this era.
How it is counted
  • Branches of the era. We take the ancient samples whose date falls inside the era, and compare the lines as they stood 1,500 years before the era ends.
  • A culture’s profile is the share of its lines on those branches. The number of samples does not change a weight: a culture of seven men weighs as much as one of a hundred and twenty.
  • A shallow test. An ancient man typed above the cut is spread over the branches under his node, by how many men each holds now. Today’s kits are treated the same way.
  • Who is admitted. A culture takes part when its sharply typed men cover 25% of the population on their own: branch by branch we add the smaller of the two shares, the culture’s and the population’s. One dug within 550 km needs only 0.5%.
  • The shares. We pick the weights of the cultures so that their mixture comes as close as it can to today’s set of branches.
  • Look-alike cultures. When cultures share almost all their branches, the data cannot say whose kin the men are. So we do not split the share between them: they get one bar.
  • The range. We recount everything on random subsets of the samples. In brackets are the bounds the share keeps in nine runs out of ten. A share that can fall below 5%, or below half of itself, is not shown at all.

What it does not mean. This is kinship of male lines, not the origin of a people. The female lines say nothing here. Who takes a test is a matter of chance, so the shares compare between countries, not with a census.

Ancient samples

From excavations on this territory: 368 samples by Y-DNA and 495 samples by mtDNA. The oldest: 8,515 BCE, Maglemosian culture.

Iron Age Scandinavian 129 · Medieval Danish 70 · Viking Age Danish 66 · Neolithic Scandinavian 30 · Bronze Age Scandinavian 19

All ancient samples →

Data on this page: FamilyTreeDNA Y tree, 12 November 2026: 1,635 kits; FamilyTreeDNA mtDNA tree, 11 November 2026: 1,118 kits; YFull Y tree, 2 November 2026: 102 samples; YFull mtDNA tree, 2 November 2026: 66 samples.

How to cite: ftdnastat, "Denmark: Y-DNA and mtDNA haplogroups", https://ftdnastat.github.io/en/c/denmark/, data of 2026-11-14, build 20261114-18dba71.

The data is licensed under CC BY 4.0: take it, rework it, just credit ftdnastat.